In the last 10 to 15 years, how would you tell the story of cybercrime in your country? For example: two or three turning points, who the main characters are (including who tends to be targeted most), and what the usual story leaves out.
When someone in your country is scammed, has data leaked or an account stolen, how do they usually describe what happened to them? We are interested in factors such as the words people actually use, whether the law, police or media recognize a "cyber victim", and whether any digital harm does have a clearly recognized victim (for example, children or gender-based violence).
In patterns, not cases: when a person or an organization does try to report or seek redress, what usually happens? We are interested in factors such as how people are treated, if it makes a difference when the money or evidence is abroad or not, and how people talk about their experience, for example.
How do people in your country explain why they do or do not protect themselves, report, or worry about it? For example, attitudes we have heard elsewhere such as "nothing can be done", "I'm not an interesting target" or "the app is convenient, I don't think about it", any local phrase people use, and how common that attitude is.
Who, if anyone, is seen as speaking for cybercrime victims in your country? For example, the State, prosecutors, NGOs, companies, the press or the victims themselves, how much they are heard, and why a partial exception (such as online gender violence or a fraud wave) worked where others did not.
What in this space deserves closer attention than it usually gets in your country? We are interested in themes rather than specific cases, and in what would have to happen for cybercrime victims to be named, counted and defended as a group.